Mining should be banned in protected forests

Published in the Jakarta Post, August 04, 2003

Biodiversity in Indonesia is threatened by a mining industry that is pushing the government to grant exemptions to Forest Act 41/1999, which prohibits open pit mining in protected areas. On July 18, Wimpy S. Tjetjep, Director General for geology and mineral resources publicly admitted that the total number of mining companies that seek permission for open pit mining in protected forest areas is 158.

Mining is encroaching on many fragile ecosystems, and what is at stake is a healthy environment and local livelihoods. The opinion piece by the Indonesian Mining Association (IMA), published on July 30 presented a shortsighted perspective encouraging exploitation of natural resources as a vehicle for economic development.

Forest protection, biodiversity conservation and prevention of devastating floods in Indonesia rely heavily on the protected forest and conservation area system. Indonesian protected forest areas are few but are sites of rich biodiversity with profuse endemic flora and fauna species, as well as the homelands of indigenous communities. Biodiversity underpins the environmental services necessary to maintaining productivity and a healthy and stable environment, upon which local, regional and global communities depend, services such as biodegradation, soil aeration, fertilization, carbon sequestration.

The mining industry, without needing to enter protected areas, already has a vast area under leases covering 66.891.496 ha, which is equal to 35% of Indonesia's land area. Not satisfied, the mining industry has been relentlessly lobbying the government to open up new protected areas for mining. Australian, Canadian and UK ambassadors in Jakarta are also lobbying on behalf of their multinational mining company giants, BHP Billiton, Newcrest, Placer Dome and Rio Tinto, on the matter of mining in protected areas.

Multibillion-dollar mining giants are portraying themselves as hapless victims of an arbitrary bureaucratic decision to restrict mining development through unfair environmental regulations. In fact many of the 158 leases are in areas that have been classified as protected forests for many years. It was always the case that these areas were not appropriate for mining, and it was in 1999 that the new democratic government clarified the situation and banned open pit mining in protected areas.

The push to grant exemptions to companies that seek to mine in protected areas has been met with strong opposition from local governments, civil society, indigenous communities, and concerned citizens. In South Kalimantan, the Provincial House of Representatives, led by Bachruddin Syarkawi has called on the government to reject the application by Placer Dome to mine in the Meratus Mountain forest area. The Meratus Dayak and Samihim council has also issued a passionately worded letter rejecting the mine, as it will encroach on their sources of water, their sacred sites, and their livelihoods.

In Maluku, 38 village heads from the Halmahera Regency, and the Kao and Malifut Indigenous Community Council have expressed their outrage at the current resource management scheme, and specifically the potential granting of a mining permit for Newcrest in the Toguraci protected forest.

Concerned citizens from across Indonesia have sent 6,000 postcards to their government in support of protecting forest areas from mining; and over 1,200 international letters from individuals and organizations in 43 countries have poured in to support Indonesia's decision to prevent open cut mining in protected areas, and to not bow to the will of the foreign mining companies.

The claim by the Indonesian Mining Association that "there will be no threat to any biodiversity area" is a flagrant lie. BHP Billiton's project to mine Gag Island a protected forest west of Papua, will dump dangerous mine waste into the ocean, employing the controversial Submarine Tailings Disposal technique. The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) sent a letter to the Indonesian House of Representatives identifying Gag Island's World Heritage potential because of its high biodiversity: 505 species of coral, which is an extraordinary 64% of all known coral species in the world, and 1,065 fish species, amongst the highest fish diversity in the world. UNESCO warned the government of "possible environmental impacts of mining operations and related submarine tailing disposal on Gag Island in the Raja Empat Archipelago".

The IMA assertion that mine pits only encompass a small land area ignores the fact that the 'ecological footprint' of mining extends beyond the mine site. Extensive offsite impacts occur due to erosion, water contamination, release of toxic waste and access for illegal logging. Not only do company attempts at revegetation often fail, as in the Indo Muro Kencana mine in Central Kalimantan, but even the best programs can never recreate lost biodiversity. The international conservation agreements ratified by Indonesia recognize that environments that are biodiversity poor are vulnerable to change triggered by environmental, social, or economic factors.

Indonesia has committed to the global conservation of protected areas by ratifying the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and agreed to the Statement of Forest Principles. It is part of the United Nations Forest Forum (UNFF). We therefore must honor these international treaties by prohibiting activities, such as mining in protected areas, that threaten biodiversity and forests.

Indonesia's environmental assessment process (AMDAL) is often dismissed as a sham. There is no mechanism for public consultation or participation by impacted communities. Private environment consultants, hired by mining companies to conduct impact studies, are not independent. The AMDAL is not a true evaluation of the appropriateness of a project, nor does it safeguard against breaches of environmental standards during mine operation. The announcement in the Jakarta Post on July 31, 2003 that mining companies were left out of the 2002 environmental audit process (PROPER) highlights the lack of government capacity to regulate mining impacts. "[W]e do not have clear indicators yet to appraise their environmental destruction, and that is why the government has decided not to include mining companies on the list of firms to be audited in 2002," explained Deputy State Minister for the Environment Isa Karmisa Ardiputra.

The IMA claims that the prohibition on mining in protected areas came from the "euphoria of democracy and reforms". This trivializes legislation drafted in the best interest of the public, which is the mandate of a democratically elected government. Preserving protected forest areas through prohibiting open pit mining promotes a sustainable future for all Indonesians.

By: Julia Kalmirah, Indonesian Biodiversity Foundation (Kehati), ph. +62 818861255 and Igor O'Neill, Mineral Policy Institute, ph +62 81 2861 2286.